Due to their occurrence in language, metaphors are linguistic tools for the emergence of ideologies in texts. They essentially mirror ideological discourses. Employing metaphors as a stylistic component permits literary writers to fashion their works by highlighting, dimming, and hiding feelings, inducing false perceptions in their readership. Accordingly, drawing on Lakoff’s and Johnson’s insights about conceptual metaphor, the current study seeks to explicate the ideological metaphor of up/down in socio-critical narratives: Varaghhaie Pare Zendan (Torn paper from the Prison), Az Ranji Ke Mibarim (From the Pain we Suffer), Azar: Mah-e Akher-e Paeez (Azar: The Last Month of Fall), Sag-e Velgard (A Wandering Dog), and Kheim-e Shabbazi (Puppetry). The conceptual metaphor is one of the new approaches in semantics. The orientational metaphor is one of the conceptual metaphors by which the system of concepts is structured based on orientation/ direction (place) such as inside/outside, center/periphery, and up/down. The present study is carried out in the descriptive-analytical approach. It initially introduces its conceptual framework along with the selected narratives. Then, it identifies statements containing up/down metaphors in the narratives. Afterwards, the study will analyze the relationship between the detected metaphors and the ideology of the narratives to explore the role of up/down metaphors in power relations within the narratives. The findings of this work demonstrate the writers (of the selected narratives) have benefitted from the up-down metaphors to represent the abstract concept of power and its relations, to reflect their ideologies, and to show the confrontation between the oppressor and the oppressed which is the most important constituents in socio-political narratives.
Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam,Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Lakoff, G & Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors we live by, Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). "The contemporary theory of metaphor', In Geeraerts, dirk (Ed). (2006) Cognitive linguistics: basic readings (Cognitive linguistics research: 34). Mouton de Gruyter Berlin, New York, pp. 185-238.
Saeed, john I. (1997), Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage publications.
----------. (2001). "Multidiskiplinary CDA: a Plea fir Diversity. In R.-------
-----------------. (2006). "Ideology and Discorse Analysis". Journal of Political Ideoligies. 11/2. Pp. 115- 140.-
-Weber, M. (1978).Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 2Vols.California: University California Press
niksiyar,Z. and Dorpar,M. (2024). Explication of Up/Down Metaphor in the Selected
Politico-Critical Narratives. Societies in Persian literature, 3(6), 63-80. doi: 10.30488/sipl.2024.447482.1050
MLA
niksiyar,Z. , and Dorpar,M. . "Explication of Up/Down Metaphor in the Selected
Politico-Critical Narratives", Societies in Persian literature, 3, 6, 2024, 63-80. doi: 10.30488/sipl.2024.447482.1050
HARVARD
niksiyar Z., Dorpar M. (2024). 'Explication of Up/Down Metaphor in the Selected
Politico-Critical Narratives', Societies in Persian literature, 3(6), pp. 63-80. doi: 10.30488/sipl.2024.447482.1050
CHICAGO
Z. niksiyar and M. Dorpar, "Explication of Up/Down Metaphor in the Selected
Politico-Critical Narratives," Societies in Persian literature, 3 6 (2024): 63-80, doi: 10.30488/sipl.2024.447482.1050
VANCOUVER
niksiyar Z., Dorpar M. Explication of Up/Down Metaphor in the Selected
Politico-Critical Narratives. Societies in Persian literature, 2024; 3(6): 63-80. doi: 10.30488/sipl.2024.447482.1050